I think our best advice is highlighted in the recommendations. John mentioned the concept of professional judgment. The culture of relying on professional judgment is.... Obviously we do have to rely on professional judgment. At the same time, we also have to have things clear so that it can transfer from one generation to the next, from one inspector to the next. You need both. You need it to be well planned and systematic, with all the risks identified.
My guess is that the industry does that. The regulator should be doing it as well. Our best advice is to look at our audit that we did this year, and also our previous audits, and make sure that they are ahead of the industry, as opposed to....
To me, making a mistake in your database saying a site inspection was completed when it wasn't completed.... What if that thing, that piece or unit or something, blew or didn't work, and it created a real problem, but it was marked in their database as inspected? This means that maybe it doesn't get inspected again for two years or three years, and maybe then it's six years between the times it gets inspected. Those kinds of mistakes should not be happening with the regulator of an important precision industry. It provides 15% of our electricity, and over 60% in Ontario. It's important, and it had better be precise.