It's definitely the burden of proof. As an example right now, we've done pilot testing and we've used it in the field. For them to fund a project of that size, they want almost another project that's 50% that size to work in a real-life manner as well. It doesn't make any sense for us to build a pilot half the size of the pilot that we want to test out just so we can get $400,000 in funding.
That burden gap is more for $20-million projects, not for a $400,000 grant. Especially with that particular funder through the federal government, they are used to doing projects that are a lot bigger, and not the smaller projects. The burden of proof is built for those bigger projects to get the $20 million. We can't scale up to their size and to what their burden of proof is. It has been good enough for the provincial government, but not for the federal government, because there are two different standards.