We've scratched our heads a little bit—I'll be honest—around some of the interim measures for GHG on big projects, but as we've worked through it with our members, I think we've come to the conclusion that we can get through this. It does provide an opportunity to highlight, and in that interim measures piece we've asked to make sure that there is recognition for the leading climate policies in jurisdictions like Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan.
It's not just about every project increasing GHGs. We know that. Almost anything you do will increase GHG emissions, but it's really about how we use that mechanism in that environmental assessment process to highlight those pretty significant climate policy commitments made by governments like Alberta and British Columbia, for example. We think there is an opportunity in that space.
But we also have a steady eye looking forward to what we're hearing, that there is going to be some broader work done on looking at Canada's environmental assessment process broadly speaking and where we can backstop or increase the robust nature of the socio-economic analysis elements of that because that's a fundamental part of the story when you're deciding on a project and having—