We can talk more on that. I only have a limited amount of time and I appreciate that, but I wanted to speak to Kevin and Jeffrey.
I was happy to see that you talked about Canada as a leader in the standards in terms of innovation and technology. I had an opportunity a couple of times last year to meet with representatives from the Chinese Petroleum Corporation and talk about the Canadians that are going over to Taiwan. I think, Kevin, you might have touched on it as well, to talk to them about how to build pipelines.
We are a global leader in terms of our standards, and we've heard the government talking about how we want to have a new review process and new ways of talking about standards and evaluating energies. We're talking about a new review process there—I'm not saying we can't always be better—but if we're already a global leader, and our standards are among the best in the world, what are we missing? What are we having to add in terms of another layer? Is this unnecessary, or are we to be the best? Why are we adding additional layers of review and consultation when we already seem to be the best in the world at this?