We're not sure that extending the length of the process and having additional consultation is going to result in more confidence in the process itself. We will have more confidence in the process when governments stand up and make a strong case for why approving these pieces of infrastructure will be important for the economy as a whole, and for how this can be done in such a way as to mitigate the impacts.
We understand that the principles were conceived to increase the confidence of the public in the industry. We think that's fine. We're worried, however, that the delay is not going to make the end decision any easier, that it will still be difficult and controversial. We want to be sure that both the Canadian public and members of Parliament know why it is so important to the economy for properly regulated and reviewed export infrastructure to get built.