I asked because I certainly perceive that it will be a major barrier in terms of the 10-year transfers if there's no opportunity to become an equity partner.
Next, perhaps you can advise me on the following. We have an example of a company that produces a value-added product, which we, of course, would like to see. They sell their product into the States, and because it's a value-added product they get captured under codes 4407 and 4409 of the export control list. Essentially it's a value-added product on which an astronomical duty is being paid—not the 20%. Their argument is that they just got captured in the softwood lumber challenges.
I understand there is more than just this one company. Have you identified a number of examples throughout this country of people who have been caught up and are being challenged by this sort of categorization?
That's number one, and I think it's important—