I was going to pass it to Mike, but I'll try it quickly.
As I alluded to earlier, British Columbia adopted an auction system, which was partially adopted in an effort to make reforms that were hoped would reduce the potency of U.S. arguments that the B.C. system is providing a subsidy.
Mike and his team did an excellent job at the WTO to show that the B.C. system offers fair prices when compared to a reasonably comparable benchmark. That is why we were ultimately largely successful, both at the WTO and using those same arguments as part of the annual review process to have the duties cut by more than half in that first annual review.
Certainly, it's very important that the provinces are cognizant of this issue when formulating their forestry practices. Obviously, they still have broad leeway in how they do that, and we work with them to make sure we understand it fully so that we can bring the best arguments forward in our dispute settlement.
As I said, I think Mike and his team had some great success, both at the WTO and with respect to the current duty.