In the United States, I think the critical minerals issue is viewed principally from a consumer perspective, so it's about supply chain risks and how to mitigate those risks through a variety of approaches. Clearly there's a producer perspective that says consumer risk leads to opportunities for additional domestic production. I would say that the principal difference is really in one of perspective between the U.S. and Canada.
Canada I think has more of a producer perspective: Aren't there opportunities for Canada to get into the supply chain to alleviate risks that customers face? Whereas in the United States, it's in some sense a little more multi-faceted.