I think it is something that is quite clear. Now it can be done; the know-how is there. The industry knows how to do these things, as Derek mentioned. Of course, it goes faster than when you use concrete. On top of that, when you use engineered wood, you are using wood with more value added. We could also export these products down to the U.S. and not face some extra tax burden, because these are value-added products. Therefore, there is really an opportunity to create jobs, reduce GHGs, and at the same time create an expertise that is hardly taxable on the other side of the border.
So yes, it can be done. The way government can help is to really use its purchasing power as a showcase and to make people proud of what it is. We see more and more schools and municipal pools and stadiums being built, and we don't see any painting on these walls the way it is on the ones made out of concrete. The youth are really proud of these buildings. The community gathers around these buildings because they create a sense of community.
It's good for the environment, it's good for the community, it's good for value-added products and it's really strong on what Canada does best, strengthening engineering and introducing that with new wood products. It's a winning combination.