Thank you, Mr. May.
Well, it's a very big question, I think.
To pick up on something that Mr. O'Connor was emphasizing in his remarks, one of the things that I think this committee could potentially have an influence on, given the fact that the clean fuel regulations have yet to be promulgated in the Canada Gazette, part II—they're still under development—is to push for a potential reorientation in the design of these regulations and to focus on the development of renewable fuel pathways and energy pathways that are consistent with reductions in that 75% of emissions in the life cycle that Mr. O'Connor was referring to in terms of end-use combustion. Those scope 3 emissions are really what we need to reduce in order to make progress on these longer-term aspirations that we have for net zero by 2050.
Right now, I think the regulation is trying to do a lot of things in terms of supporting pathways like carbon capture and enhanced oil recovery, which may be legitimate things to support when we bring in other criteria like just transition, but in terms of the math of reducing carbon emissions, that focus on scope 3 is something that could be enhanced through the regulation that's under development right now.