Great, thank you.
Let me ask another question here.
To build on what Mr. Patzer said earlier, I note there's a report by a group called Thunder Said Energy in the U.K. that has confirmed something that a whole bunch of studies have said, namely, that the CO2 produced from biofuels when you break new land is effectively double what you're replacing that fuel with.
Mr. Jaccard from the University of Victoria was one of our witnesses a week ago. He said he's seen 30 studies like that. He disagrees with those studies.
Can you comment on that? It seems that this is a recurrent theme, that we're actually producing more CO2 from biofuel production with new land being broken, as opposed to the already existing stock of biofuels material.