Yes, I think sometimes in this conversation different proponents are talking past each other based exactly on this lack of clarity around the definition of what we mean when we say the word “subsidy”.
To Finance or Natural Resources—or both, whichever is appropriate—I am trying to get a sense, first of all, of the contribution to GDP and exports, broken down by sector, of oil, gas, quarrying, forestry, fishing, agriculture and hunting. If that's not possible right off the top of your heads, which seems eminently reasonable to me, could you please provide that to the committee in a written submission?