The comparative advantage in theory from resources that are known to exist here versus what we're able to do or what we're doing.... In British Columbia, I know that the average time to develop a mine through permitting is 13 years. The amount of critical minerals and other metals we need is so vast that it would be very difficult, impossible. The Ring of Fire in Ontario is viewed in industry, I think, as a stalled opportunity. There are very complex issues there, which we're all aware of. If we don't solve them, we won't have the wherewithal to have the clean energy future. It's a big worry.
LNG is sought after in parts of the world that must rely on more emissions-intensive fuels. I know there is a determination by some voices we've heard that if a solution is not 100% effective in solving a problem, then it mustn't be pursued. I don't think that's how most of us approach anything in our lives. LNG will cause considerable relief for nations that are looking at ways...whether it's nuclear or firing natural gas instead of coal in their electricity sector, be it Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia or India. They really want this, and they also want energy security. They don't want just to rely on a single country in the Middle East to supply all of it because that's a poor principle, as they've found.
Canada has a role—