Natural Resources Committee on Oct. 30th, 2023

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

We'll move to CPC-97, which is inadmissible. The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

I challenge the chair.

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

We will now go to CPC-98, which is inadmissible. The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

I challenge the chair.

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

We will go to CPC-99. The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

I challenge the chair.

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

We are now going to CPC-100.

I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Jeremy Patzer, Conservative, Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK]

I challenge the chair.

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 3)

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

CPC-101 is inadmissible.

The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

I challenge the chair.

(Ruling of the chair sustained [See Minutes of Proceedings])

[Mike Lake, Conservative, Edmonton—Wetaskiwin, AB]

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

I want to clarify that I don't know what the circumstances are, or what the rules are. I'm not sure whether Charlie Angus actually apologized in the House.

I'm wondering whether he is allowed to be part of the committee if he hasn't apologized in the House.

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

Thank you, Mr. Lake, for your point of order.

All members here are members in good standing on this committee.

We will move to CPC-102.

CPC-102 is inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

Are you challenging the chair?

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

No, it's a point of order because you did not explain why it's inadmissible.

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Larry Brock, Conservative, Brantford—Brant, ON]

Now I challenge you.

(Ruling of the chair sustained [See Minutes of Proceedings])

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

Colleagues, I will ask only one member to have their mic on and to not speak over others, because it is difficult for the interpreters to interpret.

CPC-103 is inadmissible.

The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[Jeremy Patzer, Conservative, Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK]

I have a point of order first.

[An hon. member]

I challenge the chair.

[Jeremy Patzer, Conservative, Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK]

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

We will now go to CPC-104.

The amendment seeks to make a substantive modification by adding new elements to the preamble. Since no amendment has been adopted to warrant the addition of these new elements, I declare the amendment inadmissible.

[An hon. member]

I challenge the chair.

[The Chair, Liberal, George Chahal]

(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)

We are on LIB-16.

Shall LIB-16 carry?

[An hon. member]

I request a recorded vote.