Then I'd like to take you back.
One of the things this bill does—in clause 28, I believe—is give an enormous power to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to say that you cannot do any offshore energy project, including wind, if DFO “may” be thinking about a marine protected area. You'll recall, from when you were fisheries minister, your visit to the eastern shore and the 200 lobster fishermen who came in to greet you on the area of interest off the eastern shore. You'll also recall that it's an area that was set up in 2018.
You were about to turn it into a marine protected area at the time, and the objections of the committee, because nobody had been consulted.... None of those people have been consulted with regard to any of the offshore wind projects to date or the creation of this bill. They pushed back on you because there had been no socio-economic study. You were going to oppose that in an area where they have few opportunities to make a living other than lobster, mackerel and herring. You were going to close it down.
You suspended that, but the Damocles sword is still hanging over everybody, and that's what DFO does. You've given it the power in this bill to stop everything in the ocean with regard to what you want to do with offshore energy. Why would you do that?