Working with private forest owners is key to unlocking the full potential of Canada’s forestry sector. Crown land forests are pressured by pests, the creation of protected areas, public interest in other uses, and aboriginal rights, while private forests remain largely underexploited. Nonetheless, these landowners are ready to invest in silviculture, fire mitigation, regeneration, carbon capture, habitat management and climate adaptation, but they need the right tools and incentives to be provided by government.
We would like to make four recommendations to the committee, which we believe would strengthen the forestry sector through a better use of the potential of private forests.
First, the Canadian Forest Service must deepen its understanding of private forest ownership and management. This includes recognizing the diversity of ownership models and the economic realities of small-scale producers and the ecological services they provide. With better data and engagement, CFS can develop policies that are relevant, equitable and globally innovative. A current lack of knowledge prevents this.
Second, we agree with our colleagues that resolving the softwood lumber dispute is critical for the government. Exempting private forest lands would be helpful. We should secure an exemption for lumber made from wood harvested from private lands. These woods are not subsidized and should not be penalized under trade agreements that target Crown timber.
Third, ensure the federal government supports private landowner rights when negotiating indigenous claims and enacting federal legislation. We suggest that private lands be explicitly exempt from indigenous land claims and that the federal government continue to support policy measures such as “no expropriation” and “willing buyer, willing seller”.
In terms of federal legislation like the Species at Risk Act, the federal government should work with provinces to ensure that critical habitat measures are found first and foremost on Crown land.
Finally, to stimulate long-term investment in forest management, we recommend the creation of a personal silvicultural savings and investment plan, similar to an RRSP. This fiscal tool would allow forest owners to set aside income from timber sales in a tax-deferred account that is earmarked for future silvicultural work. It would enable greater investments in working private forests that are local to mills, therefore generating a cheap flow of accessible timber.
In conclusion, we call on the federal government to adopt a more inclusive and comprehensive approach to forest policy—one that recognizes the unique role of private forest owners and ensures they are part of the solution.
Thank you.