Absolutely, and this is where I come back to bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. This is from the Canada Energy Regulator in its modelling for a net-zero world in 2050. It modelled that the number one source of electricity generation in Saskatchewan, which is where I grew up, would be biopower. People ask how that would be the case. That is because you're generating two products. You're generating electricity for local use, and you're generating an exportable carbon dioxide removal. The sale and the margin on that carbon dioxide removal lowers the net cost of energy.
The Canada Energy Regulator found that the net cost of energy would be negative. In other words, it would out-compete everything else because of the sale of this carbon dioxide removal. We do have some existing coal-fired assets, primarily in Saskatchewan, and then obviously there has been the conversion of the coal-fired power plants in Alberta to gas, but those plants can be retrofitted. In general, the fuel by itself, if you're just talking electricity, will be higher cost, but this is where the addition and the additional product are really critical to making those economic numbers work.