Yes, that's it, but you explained more candidly and directly what I was trying to say.
Earlier, you spoke of an idea that I don't think we've ever considered. People may have thought about it, but we've never considered it in committee. As part of an agreement, we could study different products so that the pricing system applied varies by species or product.
There's a possibility that some wood species and some products are being dumped in the United States, but I've never heard from a witness that we should be thinking in terms of specific products during negotiations. We know that Americans don't have lumber, structural lumber, that compares to what Canada produces. The reason why they can turn up their noses at our forest industry is because their mortgage rates are sky high and construction is virtually at a standstill.
I think it would be good to talk more about the point you raised. Could you go over that in a bit more detail?