Sure.
I think it's a myth that nuclear costs are higher than solar costs. Comparing the two of them is like comparing apples and oranges. One of them provides steady baseload power throughout the day, hundreds of days at a time, at a high power rate—thousands of megawatts, quite literally—and literally for hundreds of days at a time. The other one stops when the sun goes down and starts and provides a very spotty performance when the sun is up. The two of them are not comparable when it comes to costs. That's the main thing I would say.
On the idea that nuclear is something that will be gone in the next few years, I just simply disagree with that.