I can answer that.
We would rely heavily on the investment tax credits and also the current carbon trading system, potentially in either Alberta or B.C. We've worked that into our model. The investment tax credits definitely support the economics of our facility.
The third piece to it was that there's currently a heavy insurance burden on rail traffic for dangerous goods in Canada. We were part of the conversation between CN and Transport Canada looking for some economic support, not only on the insurance for those railcars but also on the freight costs. Transport Canada developed a safety framework that was fairly onerous and increased costs. Ammonia is toxic.
The tax credits work for us. The carbon levy system works for us. The challenge was the rail transport. That's eventually what kind of stopped us from moving forward on our facility in Alberta.