I might articulate it in this way. When I speak about our energy information mandate, that market analysis, those broad supply-and-demand scenarios and the long-term economic analysis and information we provide as part of that mandate would be very much in broad macroeconomic contexts. What you're asking about are specific project estimates and potentially cost estimates related to specific initiatives, and I would differentiate the energy information mandate from our energy adjudication mandate.
With respect to specific project decisions, when there's an application before the CER that's before our commission, during the quasi-judicial function of adjudicating any project that comes before the CER, part of the analysis in terms of either the safety regulatory oversight mandate we hold or the economic regulatory oversight mandate we hold—on toll and tariff matters, for example—would include that kind of economic analysis.
What you're describing is often provided in the context of project proponents bringing that information forward. That wouldn't be something the CER would develop itself.