Thank you for the question.
I think that right now, with the government's “projects of national interest” approach, we see the choosing of projects that offer opportunities to position Canada for a variety of different reasons. One—and there's the criteria that I've applied there—is looking at climate competitiveness. Given a world that is electrifying, that is an essential piece, when we're looking at finite resources, people's finite time and finite dollars, to make sure those projects are building opportunities for where the global economy is going and where exports are going.
I think there's the opportunity to learn lessons from this, where we've selected a smaller number but that can then be applied to a wider suite. It doesn't have to be either-or. We can choose priorities and then take the lessons learned as we move projects through those processes and apply those lessons more generally.