Right. I was just sharing my understanding of the matter.
I'd like to come back to a second point.
Federal schemes provide tax relief and certain tax credits. However, when I look at the difference between the costs of a nuclear project and those of an intermittent energy project—whether it be wind or solar power—I see a huge disparity. This means that, ultimately, the disparity in the tax credit is also enormous.
If you were to say that a company like Hydro-Québec could receive a tax credit for building a dam, that would involve enormous costs. It's a poor example, since Hydro-Québec doesn't pay tax to the federal government, but it's just to illustrate that we're talking about huge sums.
If we grant these same benefits to nuclear projects, there is a risk that this will tie up a considerable amount of public money. I therefore have some reservations in this regard, particularly as we know that wind and solar projects incorporating battery storage strategies are progressing very rapidly.
Should we put all our eggs in one basket—in this case, the nuclear basket?