That's an excellent question.
Beginning with public perception, social licence is very important for this. There has to be an effort made by industry and government jointly to socialize these ideas, to demystify them and to correct misperceptions.
The enrichment of uranium is a technology that's well known. It's been adopted across the world. It is the same technology that's used for weapons production and for civil commercial uses. On the civil commercial uses side, there's a very well-established safeguarding mechanism through the International Atomic Energy Agency that verifies and monitors that these facilities are doing what they intend to do and what they say they are doing, which is peaceful production of enriched uranium.
If Canada were to pursue the domestic enrichment of uranium, part of the steps to do that would be to engage with the IAEA to ensure that those safeguards were in place. We have safeguards over our entire current nuclear fuel cycle to make sure that everything we're doing is civilian in orientation. We'd really be expanding that relationship. Educating the public on that is a key point.
I'm sorry, could you articulate again the first question?