We don't actually claim to know what the entire industry thinks today, of course. However, according to a number of colleagues and associations, there is a high degree of receptiveness to the report and the recommendations we have tabled. Generally speaking, I think there's good collective alignment.
Since you're talking about the industry's path forward, it would be important to mention to parliamentarians that we also didn't want to be complacent about the industry and its direction. There is a segment of the report where we are also very critical of leaders who have not been able to be agile and bold enough to develop more resilient business models.
At the end of the day, the goal is not to have added value or integrated groups. Integration must be done as it is in a number of companies, through clusters, hubs or whatever technical terminology we use. Nevertheless, it must be done, because it is an ingredient of the resilience we want to see reflected in all the aspects mentioned in our report and recommendations.
Resilience in the industry will ensure that it remains cyclical in terms of commodities. There will still be lows within the cycles. Today, as we see, business models that foster integration and are part of integrated, interconnected and optimized clusters are what show the resilience we collectively need in this country. The communities need it, as do the workers. We feel that is the angle that must be taken into account as we move forward.