There are basically three. The first is the stability of access to the raw materials that are seen and understood as such, as well as the capital that naturally comes with it, to be able to exploit the potential of the bioeconomy, biofuel and bioenergy.
The second is forest land production. There's an important caveat here in the nuances of our recommendations. In Finland, planting takes place on 80% of forest land. At a threshold of 80%, that's no longer a forest ecosystem, a guarantee of biodiversity; it's agriculture. Our recommendation here is to increase the land currently under forest management from 5% to 10%. That would mean maintaining a perfectly reasonable threshold so as not to compromise biodiversity, but to double wood production in Canada.
Third, the Finnish population understands the logging and processing of a tree, how it's done and why it's done. Canada can certainly have a similar forestry culture.