Regardless of whether the motion is presented pursuant to Standing order 108(3)(f), the substance does not fall under subsection (3)(f). I believe there is a problem concerning that subsection. There is a battalion of clerks and people ready to provide us with advice. Why not ask them whether the motion complies with subsection (3)(f)? Given their large number, they will certainly be able to present us with a legal opinion by Thursday.
The analyst said that he had checked the matter. But that is not true: I checked. There is a much broader interpretation, but that is not the case in this specific matter. We are dealing with this document until proven otherwise.