Mr. D'Amours moves that the words “to ensure the continuation of this program” be added after the words “set in fiscal 2005-2006”.
Does the amendment need to be debated?
Evidence of meeting #15 for Official Languages in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was survey.
A recording is available from Parliament.
The Clerk
Mr. D'Amours moves that the words “to ensure the continuation of this program” be added after the words “set in fiscal 2005-2006”.
Does the amendment need to be debated?
Conservative
Conservative
Rob Anders Conservative Calgary West, AB
This may be an issue of interpretation or something, but I have it as “fiscal 2005-2006”, rather than “year”. Is there a difference between the English and French translation?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon
It should read “fiscal years”.
Yes, it would appear to be a typo in English. We will have to correct that.
Good point. Thank you.
The Clerk
We have to check whether everyone agrees with Mrs. Barbot's motion to replace section 108(2) by section 108(3)(f).
Conservative
Conservative
Liberal
Jean-Claude D'Amours Liberal Madawaska—Restigouche, NB
Mr. Chair, I would like a recorded vote, please.
Conservative
The Clerk
According to the wording of the motion, it will have to be presented to the House, probably tomorrow or as soon as we have made it into a report.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Guy Lauzon
Yes.
I would now like to inform all committee members that on Thursday, at 1 p.m., I will be at the Liaison committee to try and get the necessary support for our trip. It will then have to be submitted, and I hope we will receive permission from the House.
Very well done. Thank you.
The meeting is adjourned.