In response to your first question, the statistics in Table 7 come from the 2004-2005 annual report of Treasury Board Canada. They aren't figures that we made up; they're figures that we took from a report by the federal government, by the Treasury Board. I invite you to consult the 2004-2005 annual report; you'll find these figures there.
These figures are very clear, and they tell the truth. This is a statistical instrument for measuring language knowledge in the federal public service. It comes from the Canadian government.
62% of federal public service positions in Quebec — excluding those in the Quebec portion of the National Capital Region — require knowledge of English, for a population of 590,000 Anglophones.
Let's compare the situation to that prevailing on the other side of the river. In Ontario, 10% of federal positions — excluding those in the Ontario part of the National Capital Region — require knowledge of French, for a roughly identical Francophone population of 510,000 inhabitants.
These statistics are issued by Treasury Board Canada. They are not statistics that come from us or a federal agency.
In response to your question on university funding, if you compare funding received by Quebec's English-language universities with that received by university institutions outside Quebec offering programs in French, you'll see that English-speaking Quebeckers are funded and received seven times more university funding than Francophones outside Quebec. They receive seven times more!
Mr. Chong, I'm sure that, if you also compare the number of Anglophone students to the number of Francophone students, this won't change a great deal. You'll see that Francophones are at a disadvantage at the university level, whether it be in Quebec or outside Quebec.