I agree with the motion in principle. I have one single concern. As Pierre said, Hockey Canada representatives could simply tell us that the matter is before the court and that they cannot answer our questions. If the meeting were in camera, would we not be able to get some answers? In other words, information given by Hockey Canada could be used against Mr. Doan when he appears in court.
As well, everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Until a decision is rendered, even if there are allegations, he is still innocent. That said, Hockey Canada was clearly not at the top of its game when it appointed Mr. Doan captain, I will grant you that. It would be good to understand what really happened.
I wonder whether they will be able to speak, given that the case is before the courts. If they say that it was a bad decision, could that not be used against Mr. Doan in court? That is not our objective. We have to establish whether it was appropriate to appoint that person captain of the Canadian team.