Then maybe we either weren't asking the right questions or we were not pressing home what she is responsible for. I didn't hear anyone say, “You're not answering my question. Your responsibilities are this, this, and this, and I want you to comment specifically on this, this, and this.”
So if we had questions of a particular witness and they were not asked or clarified, even if they appeared before the committee previously...I think this is Monsieur Godin's argument. Monsieur Godin's argument for having the minister come back is that we want to
clarify questions. We're currently conducting a study, so more direct questions must be asked regarding our concerns, our lack of knowledge and understanding of certain matters.
So we must do that with the Public Service Agency, a representative of which appeared here, just as the minister also appeared before this committee. If we want to ask more specific questions, we could put them
to the Canada Public Service Agency. We have an opportunity.
I think this is a better use of the committee's time. They have specific responsibilities when it comes to the implementation of what it is we're looking at—the very questions we were asking at the end of the last meeting.