I want to support the motion. The same thing happened in New Brunswick. The federal legislation is clear, services must be provided in both official languages.
In New Brunswick, when someone was pulled over by the RCMP, they had to wait 20 or 30 minutes on the roadside for a police officer who could speak French to come and talk to them. So, they became second-class citizens. Because we're francophones, we had to sit on the roadside and wait. It made no sense. The Supreme Court decision on this was quite clear.
With regard to the coast guard, we need only recall the case of the Apollo vessel, where a man had applied for a job and he was told that he wasn't bilingual enough to get it, although it was a fishing boat from Shippagan. The coast guard refused to give him a job because he couldn't speak English well enough. Yet, he had done that job for six years.
At the time, we allowed people from Halifax do the same job without being bilingual and yet we're talking about a boat from Shippagan, a place that is 99.99% francophone. But that individual could not have that job. They told him that it was because he needed to be bilingual.
In that instance, the individual cannot have access to services in his or her language. I want to know the coast guard policy. How does it provide services to the public? This is a federal responsibility.