Thank you for the question.
My view is that so far it has proven to be adequate. The basis I would put that on is as I indicated, and as General Dumais indicated: to the best of our knowledge, we've never had a situation, a search and rescue case itself, where linguistic issues were seen as contributing in any fashion to the case. So from the perspective of the actual search and rescue operation, no.
I would also say that as with any other organization, the level of our service is reviewed and audited from time to time on a regular basis to determine whether the level in which the service is being provided is adequate. Generally, that has been sustained in the reviews in the past.