Mr. Chairman, I fail to see what difference the amendment proposed by the Liberal Party will make to Mr. Chong's motion. I know that Mr. Coderre is obsessed with the minister and that he absolutely wants to see her. I understand him, that is his right. But how would that change the motion? According to the proposed amendment, we would discuss certain agreements between the federal government and the Ontario government in depth. So specialists would appear and tell us how they have allocated the funds, how the funding was moved and what the outcome is supposed to be. After having heard from these experts or officials who are much more familiar with the agreement than we are, we could perhaps make recommendations or suggestions taking into account the provinces' jurisdiction. That way, we will have an overview.
I have been in Parliament for two years. Why not invite Mr. McGuinty, the Liberal in Ontario? It is his jurisdiction. Why wouldn't he come to the committee? Doesn't he know anything about this matter because he is the Premier? This is very precise data. Nevertheless, I am entitled to present a subamendment to have him appear. I could invite the other Liberal minister, the one from New Brunswick, who did the same thing to immersion schools for anglophones. How many Liberals will I have to invite?
Mr. Coderre, in Quebec, it was Mr. Bourrassa who misled us.