Is it because they're recurrent that they're not in your analysis? I just want the public and the committee to see that there are a number of reasons there are delays. To not include them leaves not a full picture. I understand their recurrence, and they've been happening over years and years in different governments, etc., but from what I was told this week, by people in this room, there are in fact reasons there are delays. I just want to make sure we have a clear picture. Is that a clear picture, sir?
Evidence of meeting #37 for Official Languages in the 40th Parliament, 2nd session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was organizations.
A recording is available from Parliament.