I would like to ask Mr. Weston a simple question.
How can we find out whether there have been problems or gaps if we don't look into those issues?
What information is available to say that there wasn't a problem, without studying it? That's really what we want to do, and when you talk about le soutien des Canadiens, if this committee is seen as being inept and not studying issues when they arise, then people will start to lose respect for the committee and for the official languages.
It's not a witch hunt. We just want to study whether there was a problem or not.