You can talk about BS if you want, but I feel that we are sort of at cross-purposes in this debate. I think we are stooping rather low, but we can still get back on the right track. I am very surprised to see that some people don't want to do this work. I honestly think it's very disappointing.
We have many things to do. But how could we refuse the report when everyone was waiting for it? We would have never known that there was a problem if we had not agreed to receive it and to look at it. How can we guess the content and the form of a report before we see it?
It is all a matter of perspective: some are talking about a forced unanimous consent whereas others think that the consent was legitimate. We have to see. I personally felt I was pushed to the wall. We had no choice. In order to continue our work and move discussions forward, we need documents. They have to be submitted; we have to get them.
But once we have them and if we realize there has been an affront, a major blow to official languages, what do we do? We no longer have a way out, we are trapped, we can no longer do the study, ask questions and continue with the research because we agreed to receive the documents? Our hands are tied and we can no longer do our work, is that it?