However, if you look at the celebrations of the war of 1812, you can see that there is a very specific historical point of view. In a way, it is being presented as the beginning of the unification of Canada as a nation, whereas I was talking about the 1837 rebellions. There was also the Act of Union in 1840. It is all part of a process. There is a slightly more militaristic slant. I do not want to read too much into the intentions behind it. But even so, there is a specific vision.
If broad themes are developed for the 150th anniversary, my impression is that we are running the same risk, and that communities will not necessarily be able to state their own needs and to really show their own history and say which figures are important to them.
Could you comment on that possibility?