Mr. Chair, I would like the minister to stop interrupting me.
This was actually very serious. Some members may laugh, but this is a serious issue for official language communities, and my colleagues from across the table constantly voiced—during the exercise we did for the roadmap—the concern that departments may use the roadmap to fund their cuts. You yourself constantly blocked the opposition's requests—in terms of resolutions—while saying that you did not want departments to use those funds. That is what you said.
Yet the minister is confirming that this is the game that is being played. The roadmap is used as a front to conceal cuts to which the minister will not even admit when the information is placed right in front of him. That is the truth, Mr. Chair.
As for your rose-coloured glasses regarding Canadian linguistic duality, have you requested from your department an analysis of the actual figures? I will give them to you.
If we leave out Quebec—where people are more bilingual than elsewhere—the number of people who can carry on a conversation in French has gone from 2,561,000 to 2,584,000 in four years. That is 20,000 more people for a country of 33 million. In terms of percentage, we have gone from 10.8% of our population being able to carry on a conversation in French to 10.2%. That is a failure. Why is a country with so many educated people unable to increase its percentage of individuals who can carry on a conversation in French?