Yes, I think we absolutely need that kind of definition. That will help us a lot.
Mr. Tremblay, you spoke about the much talked-about language clause and added the word “binding”. To my knowledge, adding the word “binding” is something new.
We want language clauses in the agreements with the provinces. However, you mentioned that only one province has a language clause, if I understood correctly, or only one province has a binding language clause. I'm not sure of the details. Why is it so difficult for the provinces to get these language clauses? How can we improve federal-provincial relations?
The problem remains. The provinces will say that it falls under their jurisdiction while official languages fall under federal jurisdiction. Investments are being made, but it makes sense to have language clauses.
What approach should the federal government take to relieve this tension between the federal and provincial governments?