The case that went before the Supreme Court was about service to a Canadian passenger during an international flight. The trial court decided that the complainant should be awarded a certain amount. The Appeal Court quashed that decision.
The Montreal Convention is an international agreement on the amounts awarded to people who sue airlines, and it limits the possibility of court appeals regarding international flights. The Supreme Court ruled that that convention—and Canada is a signatory—had precedence over the Official Languages Act.
There was a minority ruling according to which, since the Official Languages Act is a quasi-constitutional piece of legislation, Canadians should not lose their language rights when they take an international flight. You will understand that that is also our position. However, the majority of Supreme Court justices did not side with our position, but with Air Canada, and stipulated that the Montreal Convention had precedence.
Ms. Giguère, would you like to correct what I've just said?