First, on your comment regarding the defensive nature of Air Canada with respect to official languages, I would just say that in some instances where we are actually sued before courts, we have to defend ourselves. That's the nature of the judicial system in which we live. If we look at the complaints—and we raised the Thibodeau matter before.... Actually, the court awarded certain damages, but the lawsuit was for half a million dollars, and the commissioner asked for a structural remedy against Air Canada, so we were put in a situation where we had to defend ourselves. That is the first thing I really want to clarify for the record.
The other thing I would mention regarding our view that we should have a level playing field and that other carriers should also be looked at, the fact of the matter is that Air Canada is looked at closely by the Commissioner of Official Languages, whereas passengers with other airlines simply have no linguistic rights. In a context where we have 50% of the domestic market share, we are saying that you can look at seeking perfection from us, but you should also be looking at what is done with the remaining passengers on other airlines.