Why is that so? First, education comes under provincial jurisdiction, and the application is different.
I think that, with its target of 5% for francophone immigration, the Ontario government is aware of the reality. In addition, Franco-Ontarians know that they need to speak the other official language to work, unless they have a job in education or in some health centres. They have understood that.
At some point, the government told francophone immigrants that it would provide them with free language training courses. I had discussions with the Minister of Francophone Affairs at the time. I think that the action was initially very positive. It enabled francophone immigrants to take English as a second language courses for free, but they could take those courses in any educational institution in Ontario, either anglophone or francophone. Those are provincial decisions. That's when we said that, if an immigrant learns English in an anglophone institution, based on the community reference, there is a risk of investing in the second language, contributing to a loss for francophones.
In such cases, there are jurisdictional problems. I have heard about those aspects in consultations on official languages in Ontario and I have heard them in Sudbury. The roadmap can play a role of lever in some of those cases. So, if that is done, institutions will be eligible for certain funds and incentives. In that area, we have to be aware of the subtleties in the federal-provincial relations in education. In that sense, there may be some levers that can be used with the roadmap in immigration, for example.