Thank you, Mr. Chair.
That was a great question. Thank you for your answers and for your wisdom, Mr. Corbeil. I understand that something very simple may become very complicated when we start thinking about it and wanting to ask questions.
I will move very quickly because I just have six minutes. The chair is very strict about keeping track of the allotted time.
In 1990, the Mahe decision showed all the people demanding that schools be built to respect the rights of official language minorities in majority settings that it was important to count the people who could have those rights. It was important to find out the exact number. I don't have the citation from the Supreme Court, but I may be able to find it. Actually, it's where the number of people warrant it.
At Statistics Canada, how does the Mahe decision affect you? Today, we are looking at a very specific situation. That's what we want to know. Statistics Canada provides a snapshot of what Canada is all about, with the specific objective of measuring the state of the population, but not necessarily to address the arguments inherent in the Mahe case. Since that judgment was rendered, do you use it to count the adults and children who might benefit from French-language schools in majority settings?