Fine. I do not underestimate you, quite the opposite.
Mr. Power and Mr. Roy, your presentation was very, very interesting. The reality which Mr. Corbeil expressed the other day is that Statistics Canada must set priorities in the census. As I was saying earlier to Ms. Lanthier during the break, the organization has some strategic choices to make, and if we add language questions I suppose that at some point we are going to have to decide where we eliminate other questions. There is a sort of battle at Statistics Canada, you might say, to see whether questions are going to be added.
Personally, I don't believe it's a matter of cost. I'm a printer, and I know that we can make the font smaller and do a lot of things to include various elements on one sheet of paper. However, if we add questions, how can we make sure—because I think we are really at a historic crossroads—that we will elicit relevant answers? If we really want more conclusive data, we have to make the changes now, and not in 5, 10 or 20 years. How can we, as members of the committee, exert pressure on Statistics Canada for the purpose of obtaining conclusive answers to questions, so that we may improve all of the services delivered to the communities?