I knew that I would lose out. That's okay, as you have partially answered my question.
I understand that the Barreau has adopted Mr. Grammond's position, which supports the idea that judges should be bilingual. It is important to recognize that Mr. Grammond is not necessarily infallible. You have made a decision, which I assume is very informed.
I have an issue with functional bilingualism. Unfortunately, I missed the meeting where the committee heard from people who provide training. I was unfortunately unable to listen to them. However, I make a very clear distinction between someone who is perfectly bilingual and someone who meets the functional bilingualism requirement. Unless I am mistaken, you determine if someone is bilingual on a functional basis. Once again, the interpretation of what being functional in French or in English means can vary widely.
What is your position on that issue, which is very specific to functional bilingualism?