Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Pelletier, I am going to continue along the same lines as Mr. Choquette, but before that, I want to thank you for giving us the benefit of your knowledge, the fruit of your research, and your understanding of the entire Nadon affair.
I’m going back to the Constitution Act, 1982, but I don’t want to make you repeat what you have just told us in different words.
Paragraph 41(d) seems to raise a little concern on the part of some extremely prudent, almost austere, legal experts. The paragraph contains the words “the composition of the Supreme Court”.
Has anyone defined the word “composition” as it appears in paragraph 41(d) of the Constitution Act, 1982?