We are not in a position to provide opinions to you. As we indicated, we are here to provide a technical briefing to the committee and an opportunity for an in-depth look at what is in the commissioner's report. However, we can say that in this report we did include Air Canada's position very transparently. We know that Air Canada is asking that the linguistic obligations be imposed across the board on all carriers. This is not an option put forward by the commissioner. In submitting the options that seemed the best to us, we also wanted to provide Air Canada's perspective, so that the report really contained all of the options submitted by everyone.
The reason why we gave you a document today is to inform you of Parliament's intent to maintain Air Canada's linguistic obligations over the years. In the table of contents, in the first section, the three first documents in the package show this. I think that we can say in a factual way that there has always been a commitment—that is what we see—on the part of Parliament to maintain Air Canada's linguistic obligations. The various governments that succeeded each other maintained that commitment.