Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to mention that I support the amendment.
Why is this amendment important? Because it reflects the will of the FCFA and the QCGN.
In fact, this motion isn't François Choquette's motion. It if were possible, we would even call it the QCGN and FCFA motion because they are the ones asking to meet with the Prime Minister and to be consulted before any action is taken regarding the appointment of a commissioner.
I have a letter here that every member of the committee received. I'll take the time to talk about it because I want all Canadians to be aware that, as I mentioned, this isn't my motion. It's really a motion by the groups concerned.
The letter is from James Shea, president of the Quebec Community Groups Network. I will read it to you:
The QCGN has been contacted by M. François Choquette about the motion he intends to introduce to the House Standing Committee on Official Languages (LANG) during its meeting on June 13, 2017. The motion makes a recommendation to the Prime Minister to meet with the FCFA and QCGN stakeholders, with a view to consulting our organization in the process for selecting the next Commissioner of Official Languages. The QCGN strongly supports this motion. We were disappointed that the process that led to Mme. Meilleur's nomination for Commissioner of Official Languages did not involve input from Canada's English and French linguistic minority communities, and have asked to meet with the Prime Minister regarding this matter. We are aware that s. 49(1) of the Official Languages Act requires the Governor in Council to only consult with leaders of every recognized party in the Senate and House of Commons in the nomination of a Commissioner, however, the foundational nature of language rights, and the national importance of official language minority communities in our view must include Canada's French and English linguistic minority communities. We urge you to support M. Choquette's motion next Thursday.
It's signed by James Shea, president of the QCGN.
That's why I would like to rename the motion the QCGN and FCFA motion, symbolically, of course, because we can't do it concretely. In fact, I don't think a group can table a motion before the committee. That said, I just wanted to mention that it wasn't my motion or the NDP's motion, but the motion of the QCGN and the FCFA. For those reasons, everyone should support it.