Last week, we heard Mr. Thibodeau's testimony. He explained to us that, in his opinion, an “Exit” sign above a door on an airplane or in an airport or in the Air Canada offices violates his rights.
A company like Air Canada uses airplanes, but it does not manufacture them. Before signing a contract, it could always demand that “Exit” or “Sortie” be above the airplane door. This isn't the case because these airplanes are sold around the world.
Do you think this is really a violation of Mr. Thibodeau's language rights? I don't want to play devil's advocate, but it's become… I can't think of the right word. Can you help me?